Your complete destination for Penlink training, with live sessions, on-demand modules, and certifications designed to give professionals the tools and confidence to succeed in real investigations.
Social-Media-Daten liefern wertvolle Informationen für kriminalpolizeiliche Ermittlungen
Date Posted: January 30th, 2023
There are a few persistent myths in law enforcement today: that social-media data isn’t useful for investigations, that it is too expensive to gather and analyze, and that working with social media companies is too difficult to be practical. This article will help you debunk these myths and explore how, when properly dealt with, social-media data can actually help investigators uncover behavior patterns, establish communication networks, and zero in on locations quickly and easily. Further details on these myths and more can be found in the newly released white paper Busting Myths About Collecting Social-media Data for CriminalInvestigations. Ready to start the myth-busting process?
Some of the types of evidence that can be gathered from Internet or social‑media interception include:
Incriminating communications between suspects
Photographic and video evidence
Precise locations
Big‑picture views of conspiracies
The amount of social‑media data that can be collected is impressive. In addition to calls and chats, images and videos from Internet usage can provide valuable information. Depending on the service provider, usable data can include information such as IP address (which can often be used to find a location), time, and action—e.g., uploading a video.
A target’s Google searches can provide extremely valuable information as well. For example, in an ICAC case, a target may be searching for videos of children of a certain age, which may become key evidence or provide the investigators with their next lead.
Below are some examples of the types of data you can get from social-media collection.
Facebook
Subject information
Actions
Images
Audio and video
Conversations
Google
Gmail emails
Logins
Searches
Google photos/photo albums (i.e., photos with EXIF data)
Facebook and Google are just two examples of data sources. There are also Instagram, WhatsApp, Apple iCloud, and many more. And as in many areas of today’s rapidly changing technological landscape, there is a lot of myth and speculation surrounding social‑media usage, which law enforcement organizations would be wise to cut through. The truth is, social‑media data collection is far more useful to law enforcement than many would assume. Investigators can use social-media data collection to build patterns of activity for targets, identify others with whom those targets are communicating, access specific content in conversations, and more.
Learn more about the information you can access through social media, the costs of collecting social-media data, what’s involved with setup and monitoring, and more in Busting Myths About Collecting Social‑media Data for Criminal Investigations. This white paper also answers common questions about data disappearance, data quality, and working with social-media companies.
Game day security goes beyond the field. This white paper explores how OSINT helps campus security teams identify and disrupt threats early, keeping athletes, fans, and high-profile attendees safe.
The fentanyl crisis has become a nationwide public safety threat. This case-driven webinar explores how agencies are using OSINT, digital evidence, and cross-agency intelligence to disrupt supply chains, strengthen investigations, and prevent further loss of life.
Organized retail crime is rarely isolated. Learn how investigators use shared data to connect activity across jurisdictions and expose coordinated ORC networks.
Federal prosecutors announced that a Florida lawyer has pleaded guilty in connection with an attempted bombing outside the Chinese Embassy in Washington, D.C., after authorities say he attempted to detonate an improvised explosive device near the embassy grounds.
A Lebanon County jury convicted a New York man of first-degree murder in the 2019 killing of his daughter in Palmyra and subsequent disposal of her body in Staten Island, highlighting the role of coordinated investigative evidence in securing a conviction.