Visão geral da plataforma
Veja porque é que a Penlink é líder mundial em investigações e inteligência digital com base em IA
Penlink Academy
Your complete destination for Penlink training, with live sessions, on-demand modules, and certifications designed to give professionals the tools and confidence to succeed in real investigations.
Investigators have spent the last few years learning how to work alongside generative AI. It can summarize evidence, draft reports, organize information, and answer questions in seconds. CoAnalyst360 represents the next evolution: agentic AI. Instead of simply responding to a prompt, agentic AI can work toward a broader objective, planning steps, evaluating information, and adapting as new data becomes available.
The difference between generative and agentic AI is not a minor upgrade. It changes what an investigator can reasonably ask a system to do, and it changes what comes back. Understanding that shift matters before any agency decides how agentic tools fit into its workflow.
Traditional generative AI is largely prompt-driven. An investigator asks a question or gives the system a task, and AI produces a response based on the information available at that time. It is efficient, but it is also static. Additionally, it does not revisit the question once new information arrives.
Agentic AI approaches the problem differently. Instead of focusing only on a single request, it can work toward a broader objective across multiple steps, sources, and decision points. It can evaluate what it finds, determine what should happen next, and continue pursuing the objective as additional information becomes available.
CoAnalyst360 is built around this distinction. It interprets a broader investigative objective, breaks that objective into the steps needed to pursue it, and carries the work forward instead of stopping after one response.
Cruise control is a useful comparison for generative AI. It holds a car at a set speed until the driver changes it. It performs one task well, but the driver remains responsible for deciding what happens next.
A self-driving vehicle behaves differently. It continuously reads new information, from traffic to road conditions to pedestrians, and adjusts its decisions in real time. Agentic AI follows the same principle. Instead of holding steady on one instruction, it keeps scanning, evaluating, and adapting as additional information becomes available, moving forward.
Applied to an investigation, that means CoAnalyst360 does not treat a case as a single question, followed by a single answer. It treats a case as an ongoing objective that shifts as new evidence, records, or additional information comes in.
A simple way to understand the difference is to think about planning travel. A generative AI tool can build an itinerary based on the information available when asked. That itinerary is a snapshot. It does not update if a flight changes or a venue closes.
An agentic approach manages the trip instead of just planning it. It tracks changing conditions, adjusts the plan, and works toward the traveler’s underlying goal rather than a fixed list of steps. The objective stays constant even as the path to reach it changes.
Investigations behave the same way. A case rarely follows a straight line, and new information regularly changes what matters most. CoAnalyst360 is designed to work from the underlying investigative goal, not a single fixed instruction, so it can adjust as the case develops.
Agencies are not short on data. They are short on time to connect it. Generative AI helps with individual tasks, but it still requires an investigator to ask the right question at the right moment, every time.
Agentic AI changes that requirement. Because the system works continuously toward an objective, it can surface connections an investigator did not think to ask about. That does not remove the investigator from the process. It makes the investigator’s role even more focused on what matters most: judgment, verification, context, and decision-making.
CoAnalyst360 is built specifically for that role within a law enforcement workflow, helping carry the analytical workload forward as an investigation develops, rather than requiring investigators to repeatedly restart the process with every new piece of information.
Agentic AI does not replace investigative judgment. It gives investigators a way to apply that judgment to more current, connected, and continuously evolving information.
CoAnalyst360 brings agentic AI into the Penlink platform to help investigators keep pace with cases that never stop moving. Request a demo to see it in action.
Generative AI can take on the volume that slows intelligence analysis, but UK and European standards are clear: the analyst stays accountable. Here’s where AI helps and where human judgement must still rule.
Analysts no longer struggle to find information. They struggle to find the right information fast enough to matter, and that is where human-machine teaming changes the work.
A bomb threat texted to 911 during a World Cup match at MetLife Stadium led to a rapid multi-agency response and an arrest. The case shows how quickly event security teams must move from threat to answer.
Las amenazas contra los centros de datos van desde amenazas de bomba hasta ataques con drones. La mayoría aparece primero en fuentes abiertas, para los equipos que saben dónde buscar.
Threats to data centers now range from bomb threats to drone strikes. Most of them show up in open sources first, for teams that know where to look.
Penlink analysts walk through a real investigation into a suspected Albanian organised crime group, using open-source data in Tangles and CoAnalyst360 and evidence-based analysis in PLX to surface poly-criminal connections.